Head-to-head
Nabla vs Noteless
A side-by-side, source-cited comparison. Clinical precision and note quality come from our hands-on testing; pricing, integrations and compliance from sourced facts. See how we score.
Nabla
Editor's pickTestedBest for clinicians who want a real free entry point without compliance trade-offs
Our 2026 Editor's Pick — the only ambient scribe shipping the full HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II + GDPR + ISO 27001 quartet with no audio stored by default and a real free tier.
From Free up to 30 consults/mo
Read the full review
Noteless
ProvisionalBest for nordic and dutch clinicians who want a ce-marked, iso 27001 scribe with no audio storage and seven-language coverage
Nordic ambient scribe with ISO 27001 + CE-marked status, an explicit no-training-on-customer-data position and seven-language consultation support — production-deployed across Norway, Denmark and the Netherlands.
From Free trial
Read the full reviewSide by side
| Dimension | Nabla | Noteless |
|---|---|---|
| Score type | Hands-on tested | Provisional |
| Editorial score | 9.0 | 4.4 |
| Starting price | Free up to 30 consults/mo | Free trial |
| Free tier | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Free trial | Free tier (30 consults/mo cap) | Free trial |
| HIPAA | Yes | Not disclosed |
| SOC 2 | Yes | Not disclosed |
| GDPR | Yes | Yes |
| Avoids training on your data | Yes (states it does not) | Yes (states it does not) |
| Data residency | Google Cloud regional — databases in the region of your choice | Northern Europe (no audio stored) |
| Named EHR integrations | 7 | 2 |
| Ambient notes | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-language | Yes (35+) | Yes (7+) |
Bold values flag where one tool has a public advantage in our sourced data. “Not disclosed” never counts as a no.
When to pick which
Pick Nabla when…
- Built for clinicians who want a real free entry point without compliance trade-offs
- Score type: Nabla (Hands-on tested) vs Noteless (Provisional)
- Editorial score: Nabla (9.0) vs Noteless (4.4)
- Free tier: Nabla (Yes) vs Noteless (Not disclosed)
- HIPAA: Nabla (Yes) vs Noteless (Not disclosed)
- SOC 2: Nabla (Yes) vs Noteless (Not disclosed)
- Named EHR integrations: Nabla (7) vs Noteless (2)
Pick Noteless when…
- Built for nordic and dutch clinicians who want a ce-marked, iso 27001 scribe with no audio storage and seven-language coverage
Pros & cons
Nabla
Pros
- HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II + GDPR + ISO 27001 — the full compliance quartet
- No audio stored by default; explicit no-training-on-customer-data position
- Real free tier — no credit card required
- Scale: 85,000+ clinicians, 130+ health organizations, 20M+ annual encounters
Watch-outs
- Polishes dense specialist consultations more aggressively than precision-focused alternatives
- Public pricing page isn't currently live — Pro and enterprise both sales-led today
- Published US health-system case studies remain thinner than Abridge for the largest IDNs
Noteless
Pros
- ISO 27001 + CE-marked
- Explicit no-training-on-customer-data position; no audio retention
- Seven consultation languages
- Production deployments across Norway, Denmark and the Netherlands
Watch-outs
- Pricing not publicly disclosed — sales-led
- EHR integration is largely copy-into rather than deep write-back
- HIPAA / SOC 2 not publicly enumerated — single-region GDPR + ISO 27001
FAQ
Which is better, Nabla or Noteless?
Nabla edges it on our editorial score (9.0 vs 4.4), but "better" depends on your jurisdiction, EHR and budget — see the side-by-side below.
Is Nabla HIPAA compliant?
Yes — Nabla states HIPAA compliance.
Is Noteless HIPAA compliant?
Noteless does not publicly disclose HIPAA compliance — confirm directly before relying on it.
What's the price difference between Nabla and Noteless?
Nabla starts at Free up to 30 consults/mo; Noteless starts at Free trial. Pricing is as of 2026-05-20 — always confirm current figures with the vendor.
