Every tool here follows the same loop. The differences are in accuracy, integrations, compliance and price — which is what we score.
01
It listens
During the visit the scribe captures the conversation — in person or over telehealth — so the clinician can stay with the patient instead of the keyboard.
02
It drafts
Within seconds it produces a structured note — SOAP or a specialty template — plus optional patient summaries and, in some tools, suggested codes.
03
You review & sign
The clinician edits the draft and pushes it to the EHR. The human stays accountable for the final record — the AI just removes the typing.
Vendors and early studies report meaningful reductions in documentation time and after-hours charting, but results vary widely by specialty, workflow and EHR. Treat headline time-savings figures as directional, not guaranteed — and trial before you commit.
Browse
Find your scribe by country, specialty or EHR
Jump straight to the tools available for your market, your specialty, or your EHR.
Clinical precision and note quality are hands-on tested; pricing, integrations and compliance are sourced. How we score.
Showing 10 of 40 tools
01
9.0/ 10
Score
Tested
Nabla
Editor's pickBest for clinicians who want a real free entry point without compliance trade-offs
Why it's our pick: Full HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II + GDPR + ISO 27001 compliance posture paired with a real free tier — the most defensible single recommendation for a clinician who wants to start ambient scribing without trade-offs.
HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II + GDPR + ISO 27001 — the full compliance quartet
No audio stored by default; explicit no-training-on-customer-data position
Polishes dense specialist consultations more aggressively than precision-focused alternatives
Public pricing page isn't currently live — Pro and enterprise both sales-led today
Best for us clinicians and health systems who want enterprise-grade note quality with a self-serve entry price
The strongest US-market ambient scribe we've tested. At $89/mo self-serve the product is materially better than the price suggests — note quality, multi-speaker handling and accented-English performance hold up where many incumbents drop or polite-paraphrase. HIPAA + SOC 2, onshore US data, audio not stored after the visit, no third-party data sharing, BAA standard. The wider Commure platform (post-Athelas + post-Augmedix acquisitions, $7B post-money after the September 2025 $70M round) is a sprawl — procurement should know what they're buying — but if you only want the scribe layer, it stands on its own. Trade-offs: pricing is fragmented ($89/mo web vs $129/mo iOS in-app), the trial is only seven days, GDPR isn't stated, and multilingual coverage trails Nabla and Heidi.
Strongest US-market clinical precision in our hands-on testing
HIPAA + SOC 2; onshore (US) data; audio not stored after the visit; no third-party data sharing; BAA standard
Pricing is fragmented — $89/mo on the web vs $129/mo in-app purchase on iOS
Free trial is only seven days; no indefinitely-free tier
Best for clinicians who want broad consultation-language coverage with a deep template library covering both clinical notes and correspondence
Stenoly is the European ambient scribe with the broadest consultation-language coverage in the field — 53 languages of speech, notes and supporting-document support, with a UI localized in six (English, Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, Swiss German, Swiss French). The compliance posture is comprehensive: HIPAA + GDPR + EU MDR Class I, EEA hosting, and an explicit no-training-on-customer-data position (SOC 2 is not publicly enumerated). The practical differentiator is the template library — built-in templates for clinical notes (SOAP, DAP, ADHD assessment, physiotherapy and more) and correspondence (referral letters, insurance letters, patient communications, discharge summaries), all customizable. Two AI models ship under the hood: Stenoly Essential (the default) and Stenoly Precision (higher-accuracy, paid-tier only). Pricing is published in five currencies.
53-language consultation support (speech, notes and supporting documents) — broadest in the field
HIPAA + GDPR + EU MDR Class I; EEA hosting; explicit no-training-on-customer-data position
Direct EHR integration list is narrower than the US-market leaders
Independent international press coverage is still limited
Best for canadian clinicians who need phipa + pipeda compliance with in-canada data residency
The clear choice for Canadian practices, and the most-deployed AI scribe in the country. Tali is built and headquartered in Toronto, all data processed and stored within Canada, with the country-specific PHIPA + PIPEDA compliance Canadian clinicians actually need, plus HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II for cross-border deployments. The product extends beyond ambient documentation: a Realtime Billing Agent handles Canadian government and insurance form-filling that clinicians otherwise do by hand, and a Canadian-trained Clinical Decision Support capability shipped in November 2025. Tali is an approved vendor in the Canada Health Infoway AI Scribe Program. Trade-offs: no published pricing, public language coverage isn't disclosed, and the product is single-market by design — outside Canada it's less of a fit than the global-market alternatives.
Canada's most-deployed AI scribe; only Canadian-built option
Full PHIPA + PIPEDA + HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II compliance posture
Free tier is essentially a sample, not a usable tier — capped at 5 AI Scribes/month, well below a working clinician's volume
Best for clinics that want automation across the front desk, exam room and back office — not just the note
Sully's bet is that a team of specialized AI agents on one stack beats a single ambient scribe wired to half a dozen point tools. Seven agents in the current suite: Scribe, Receptionist, Medical Coder, Nurse Triage, Pharmacist, Consultant, Interpreter. The compliance posture is unusually complete — HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001 + GDPR + PIPEDA + PDL — and per-provider pricing is published at $79/mo (Pro) or $99/mo (Premium). 30,000+ providers; $34.8M raised across six rounds, Y Combinator backed. Trade-offs: the multi-agent breadth is overkill if you only want a great scribe, and there's no published free tier or self-serve trial — onboarding is demo-led.
Multi-agent suite on one stack: Scribe + Receptionist + Medical Coder + Nurse Triage + Pharmacist + Consultant + Interpreter
Broadest enumerated compliance list in our catalog: HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001 + GDPR + PIPEDA + PDL
Multi-agent breadth is overkill if you only want a great scribe
No published free tier or self-serve trial — demo-led onboarding only
Best for clinicians who want the broadest template library in the field, a real free plan and global reach
The broadest-reach option in the field: 110 languages across 116 countries, 2M+ consults a week, and a real free plan that isn't a 7-day teaser. The standout capability is the template system — Heidi runs a Template Community where verified clinicians publish and share templates (NHS GP Consult, Psychology Session Notes, ADHD Assessment, SOAP Detailed, Mental Health Appointment and thousands more), filterable by specialty, location and category. A separate Heidi Evidence surface handles between-patient clinical Q&A with sourced citations. Multi-region compliance (HIPAA + SOC 2 + GDPR + APP + Cyber Essentials Plus); region-localized data residency. Well-capitalized for the rollout (Point72-led Series B at $465M valuation, June 2025). Trade-offs: in our hands-on testing note quality lagged the precision-focused leaders on dense specialist consults; EHR integration is region-by-region rather than a single global matrix.
Best-in-class template system — the Template Community lets verified clinicians publish and share templates; thousands of community-built Notes, Forms and Documents
110 supported languages across 116 countries — broadest reach in the field
Note quality below the precision-focused leaders in our hands-on testing for dense specialist consultations
Free plan capped at 10 "Pro Actions" per month — custom templates, Ask Heidi and document generation lock after the cap until the next cycle
Best for us health systems and academic medical centers that want the deepest epic embed and an enterprise-grade procurement path
The enterprise front-runner. Abridge partners with 200+ US health systems — Kaiser Permanente (40-hospital generative-AI rollout, the largest in healthcare to date), UPMC (12,000 clinicians by 2026), Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins, Duke Health, Mount Sinai. The Epic embed is the deepest in the category — Haiku to Hyperdrive, scribe-inside-Epic rather than alongside — and the platform has extended past documentation into revenue-cycle and prior-authorization automation. $773M raised across six rounds; June 2025's $300M Series E (a16z-led) doubled the valuation to $5.3B on ~$117M ARR. Trade-offs: enterprise sales-led only — no published pricing or self-serve trial, procurement model overkill for solo clinicians, compliance certifications not enumerated on the marketing page, and thin international availability.
Deepest Epic embed in the category — Haiku to Hyperdrive, scribe-inside-Epic
200+ US health systems including Kaiser Permanente, UPMC, Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins, Duke Health, Mount Sinai
Enterprise sales-led only — no published pricing or self-serve trial
Procurement model is overkill for solo and small-practice clinicians
Best for european and uk clinicians whose primary requirement is the broadest enumerated certification stack — and who can absorb the note-quality gap with careful clinician review
On paper Tandem Health has the most credentialed compliance stack of any ambient scribe in our catalog: CE Mark + UKCA + GDPR + ISO 27001 + 13485 + 42001 + 14001 + NEN 7510 + NHS Compliant. All data stored and processed within EU data centers, with "your data is never used to train AI" stated explicitly. The product is easy to use, with a real free tier (€0/user/mo, unlimited notes) and a published €125/user/mo Pro tier. Where our hands-on testing parts ways with the marketing: note quality has been the weak point across our test sessions, with hallucinations appearing more often than we see from the precision-focused leaders in the category. For a tool selling primarily into NHS and European primary care — where the signed note is the document of record — that's a meaningful trade-off against the otherwise-excellent compliance posture. Trade-offs continue: Europe-focused (no HIPAA, no US footprint), and EHR integration is largely 1-click transfer rather than deep embed.
Most credentialed compliance stack in our catalog: CE Mark + UKCA + GDPR + ISO 27001 + 13485 + 42001 + 14001 + NEN 7510 + NHS Compliant
All data stored and processed within EU data centers
Note quality is the headline weakness in our hands-on testing — hallucinations appear more often than from the precision-focused leaders
Europe-focused — no HIPAA, no US deployment footprint
Best for large health systems already standardized on microsoft 365 and epic that want one-vendor procurement
Microsoft's unified clinical-AI play. In March 2025, DAX Copilot and Dragon Medical One merged into a single Dragon Copilot brand, with knowledge partners (Elsevier, OpenEvidence, Wolters Kluwer UpToDate) layered alongside ambient and dictation. A nurse workflow shipped December 2025 via Epic Rover; radiology runs through PowerScribe One. The value proposition is one-vendor procurement — if you already own Microsoft 365 + Azure + Epic, this is the lowest-friction add. But the underlying ambient note quality is a clear step behind the leading independents in our hands-on testing (Abridge, Commure, Nabla and Stenoly produced cleaner notes with less manual editing), and multilingual depth lags Nabla and Heidi. Pricing is sales-led, compliance certifications aren't enumerated on the product page, and post-rebrand documentation is still fragmented.
March 2025 unification: DAX Copilot (ambient) + Dragon Medical One (dictation) under one Dragon Copilot brand
Best for therapists, counselors and behavioral-health practices that want an all-in-one ai-native ehr with a real free tier and usage-capped pricing
The most credible AI-native EHR built specifically for therapists. Pricing is uniquely usage-aligned — $1 per session, capped at $69/mo per provider — alongside a real free plan with unlimited AI notes and HIPAA-compliant telehealth. Broader compliance than most mental-health tools: HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II + PHIPA + PIPEDA + GDPR. Deep therapy-stack integrations: SimplePractice (with AI-powered migration), TherapyNotes, Carepatron, Sessions Health, JaneApp, Owl Practice. 800+ organizations and 70,000+ providers cited, including Alma, Two Chairs and Fort Health. Provisional until hands-on tested. Trade-offs: mental-health only by design; language support not publicly quantified; training-on-data position not explicitly addressed.
Real free tier — unlimited AI notes + HIPAA-compliant telehealth
Usage-capped pricing: $1/session capped at $69/mo per provider
Mental-health and behavioral-health only — not a fit for general medical practice
European and UK clinicians whose primary requirement is the broadest enumerated certification stack — and who can absorb the note-quality gap with careful clinician review
Solo physicians, therapists and allied-health clinicians who want low flat pricing with HIPAA + HITRUST-aligned security and explicit no-training-on-PHI
Swedish clinicians who need a native ambient scribe with Swedish patient-data-law compliance and in-Sweden processing — especially on Cambio COSMIC sites
European and UK clinicians whose primary requirement is the broadest enumerated certification stack — and who can absorb the note-quality gap with careful clinician review
Solo physicians, therapists and allied-health clinicians who want low flat pricing with HIPAA + HITRUST-aligned security and explicit no-training-on-PHI
Swedish clinicians who need a native ambient scribe with Swedish patient-data-law compliance and in-Sweden processing — especially on Cambio COSMIC sites
Every pricing, integration and compliance claim links to a source and carries a last-verified date. If a vendor doesn't disclose something, we say so rather than guess.
02
Scores are a transparent formula
Editorial scores aren't hand-assigned. They're computed from the sourced facts with a published weighting, so any ranking can be reproduced.
03
Reviews are verified
Clinician reviews require email verification before they're published, and aggregate ratings are shown separately from our editorial score.
04
No commercial deals
We currently have no affiliate, commission or partnership deals with any vendor. If that ever changes we'll disclose it here first — and it still wouldn't affect scores or rankings.
Verified clinician reviews
Real reviews, email-verified
Every review requires a working email to confirm before it's published, and ratings are shown separately from our editorial score. Leave one on any tool's review page.
No verified reviews yet
Be the first to share your experience. Reviews are verified by email before they appear, so they stay trustworthy.
Short, straight answers. For the full scoring rubric, see the methodology.
What is an AI medical scribe?
An AI medical scribe listens to a clinical encounter (in person or via telehealth) and drafts structured documentation — typically a SOAP or specialty note — in seconds, so clinicians spend less time charting and more time with patients.
How much do AI medical scribes cost?
Self-serve tools for individual clinicians commonly run from roughly US$99 per clinician per month, with free tiers or trials from some vendors. Enterprise and health-system products are typically quoted by sales rather than listed publicly.
Are AI medical scribes HIPAA compliant?
Most established US-focused tools state HIPAA compliance and will sign a BAA, and many also hold SOC 2 Type II. We list each vendor's stated compliance with a source — always confirm current documentation and your data-handling terms before deploying.
How does CompareScribes rank tools?
Clinical precision and note quality are scored by us hands-on after testing; integrations, compliance and value are derived from public, source-cited facts. Untested tools show a clearly-labelled provisional score. The full method is published on our Methodology page.
Is CompareScribes independent?
Yes. We currently have no affiliate, commission or partnership deals with any vendor — nothing on this site is influenced by a commercial relationship. If that ever changes we'll disclose it on the Methodology page first.
