Side-by-side
Nabla vs Sully.ai vs Tandem Health
Independent three-way comparison. Editorial scores, compliance, pricing, EHR integrations and language coverage — sourced facts and hands-on testing only, no vendor marketing.
Nabla
TestedOur 2026 Editor's Pick — the only ambient scribe shipping the full HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II + GDPR + ISO 27001 quartet with no audio stored by default and a real free tier.
Sully.ai
TestedA "team of AI employees" for healthcare — seven specialized agents (Scribe, Receptionist, Coder, Nurse Triage, Pharmacist, Consultant, Interpreter) on one stack, with the broadest published compliance posture in the field.
Tandem Health
TestedEuropean regulated clinical AI with the broadest certification stack in the field — but note quality has been the weak point in our hands-on testing, with hallucinations appearing more often than from the precision-focused leaders.
Side-by-side
Cells marked with a check are the best on that dimension across the three. Data points come from each vendor’s own published materials and our hands-on testing.
| Dimension | Nabla | Sully.ai | Tandem Health |
|---|---|---|---|
Score type Tested tools have been scored by reviewers after real use; provisional scores come from sourced data only. | Hands-on tested | Hands-on tested | Hands-on tested |
Editorial score | 9.0 | 8.1 | 7.0 |
Starting price Public pricing lets you budget without a sales call. | Free up to 30 consults/mo | $79/provider/mo | Free / €125/mo |
Free tier | Yes | No | Yes |
HIPAA | Yes | Yes | Not disclosed |
SOC 2 | Yes | Yes | Not disclosed |
GDPR | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Avoids training on your data | Yes (states it does not) | Not disclosed | Yes (states it does not) |
Data residency | Google Cloud regional — databases in the region of your choice | Not publicly disclosed | EU data centers |
Named EHR integrations | 7 | 9 | 2 |
Languages supported | 35 | 1 | 1 |
When to pick which
Nabla
Best for clinicians who want a real free entry point without compliance trade-offs.
Wins on: editorial score, languages supported.
Sully.ai
Best for clinics that want automation across the front desk, exam room and back office — not just the note.
Wins on: named ehr integrations.
Tandem Health
Best for european and uk clinicians whose primary requirement is the broadest enumerated certification stack — and who can absorb the note-quality gap with careful clinician review.
Doesn’t lead any single dimension in this set — consider this tool when overall fit (price, EHR, regional language) matters more than one decisive feature.
Pairwise comparisons
Same data, narrower scope — the head-to-head version of each pair from the three above.