Head-to-head
Mena Health vs Sully.ai
A side-by-side, source-cited comparison. Clinical precision and note quality come from our hands-on testing; pricing, integrations and compliance from sourced facts. See how we score.
Mena Health
ProvisionalBest for swiss clinicians who need 100% in-country data residency and tardoc-aware billing coding
Swiss-native ambient scribe with 100% Swiss data residency, a 250+ template library and TARDOC-aware coding for the Swiss billing system.
From Contact sales
Read the full review
Sully.ai
TestedBest for clinics that want automation across the front desk, exam room and back office — not just the note
A "team of AI employees" for healthcare — seven specialized agents (Scribe, Receptionist, Coder, Nurse Triage, Pharmacist, Consultant, Interpreter) on one stack, with the broadest published compliance posture in the field.
From $79/provider/mo
Read the full reviewSide by side
| Dimension | Mena Health | Sully.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Score type | Provisional | Hands-on tested |
| Editorial score | 5.0 | 8.1 |
| Starting price | Contact sales | $79/provider/mo |
| Free tier | Not disclosed | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| HIPAA | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 | Not disclosed | Yes |
| GDPR | Yes | Yes |
| Avoids training on your data | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Data residency | Switzerland | Not publicly disclosed |
| Named EHR integrations | 5 | 9 |
| Ambient notes | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-language | Yes (3+) | Yes |
Bold values flag where one tool has a public advantage in our sourced data. “Not disclosed” never counts as a no.
When to pick which
Pick Mena Health when…
- Built for swiss clinicians who need 100% in-country data residency and tardoc-aware billing coding
- Free tier: Mena Health (Not disclosed) vs Sully.ai (No)
Pick Sully.ai when…
- Built for clinics that want automation across the front desk, exam room and back office — not just the note
- Score type: Sully.ai (Hands-on tested) vs Mena Health (Provisional)
- Editorial score: Sully.ai (8.1) vs Mena Health (5.0)
- Starting price: Sully.ai ($79/provider/mo) vs Mena Health (Contact sales)
- SOC 2: Sully.ai (Yes) vs Mena Health (Not disclosed)
- Named EHR integrations: Sully.ai (9) vs Mena Health (5)
Pros & cons
Mena Health
Pros
- 100% Swiss data residency
- 250+ specialty templates
- TARDOC-aware coding extending ICD-10 / CPT for the Swiss billing system
- EHR connectors across Epic, athenahealth, Oracle Health, CISTEC, Axenita
Watch-outs
- SOC 2 / ISO 27001 not publicly enumerated
- Training-on-customer-data position not publicly stated
- Company financial details (founding year, funding) not publicly disclosed
Sully.ai
Pros
- Multi-agent suite on one stack: Scribe + Receptionist + Medical Coder + Nurse Triage + Pharmacist + Consultant + Interpreter
- Broadest enumerated compliance list in our catalog: HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001 + GDPR + PIPEDA + PDL
- Published per-provider pricing — $79/mo (Pro) and $99/mo (Premium)
- Broad EHR coverage: Epic, Cerner / Oracle Health, MEDITECH, Altera, MEDHOST, Veradigm, Allscripts, athenahealth + 50+ others
Watch-outs
- Multi-agent breadth is overkill if you only want a great scribe
- No published free tier or self-serve trial — demo-led onboarding only
- Data residency / hosting region isn't publicly disclosed
FAQ
Which is better, Mena Health or Sully.ai?
Sully.ai edges it on our editorial score (8.1 vs 5.0), but "better" depends on your jurisdiction, EHR and budget — see the side-by-side below.
Is Mena Health HIPAA compliant?
Yes — Mena Health states HIPAA compliance.
Is Sully.ai HIPAA compliant?
Yes — Sully.ai states HIPAA compliance.
What's the price difference between Mena Health and Sully.ai?
Mena Health starts at Contact sales; Sully.ai starts at $79/provider/mo. Pricing is as of 2026-05-20 — always confirm current figures with the vendor.
